Scavino, Navarro held in contempt of Congress in 1/6 probe

WASHINGTON – Former Trump advisers Peter Navarro and Dan Scavino have been held in contempt of Congress for his or her monthlong refusal to conform to subpoenas rendered through the House committee’s investigation into the Jan. 6 assault at the U.S. Capitol.

The two males on Wednesday was the newest contributors of former President Donald Trump’s internal circle to stand prison jeopardy because the make a selection committee continues its greater than nine-month-long probe into the worst assault at the Capitol in additional than 200 years.

The near-party-line 220-203 vote will ship the felony referrals for Navarro and Scavino to the Justice Department for imaginable prosecution.

The contempt motion adopted hours of uncooked debate at the House ground as Republicans stood through Trump and charged that Democrats have been looking to politicize the assault at the Capitol through his supporters.

House Republican chief Kevin McCarthy accused the Jan. 6 committee of “criminalizing dissent,” defended Scavino as a “good man” and lobbed harsh complaint at contributors of the committee, some through identify. “Let’s be honest, this is a political show trial,” McCarthy mentioned.


Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, a few of the 9 contributors of the Jan. 6 panel, famous that the committee has two Republicans, together with Liz Cheney of Wyoming. He added that the aim of the ground vote was once to shed light on that “open contempt and mockery for this process, and for the rule of law” is probably not allowed through the chamber.

“I mean, it is just amazing that they think they can get away with this,” the three-term lawmaker advised newshounds about Scavino and Navarro as the talk raged on Wednesday.

Cheney and Illinois Rep. Adam Kinzinger, who could also be at the make a selection committee, have been the one Republicans who voted in want of the contempt fees.

While pursuing contempt fees won’t yield any new knowledge for the Jan. 6 committee — any prosecutions may just drag for months or years — the vote Wednesday was once the newest try to display that witnesses will undergo penalties in the event that they don’t cooperate or a minimum of seem for wondering. It’s all a part of an effort to claw again legislative authority that eroded all over the Trump generation when congressional subpoenas have been regularly flouted and not noted.


“This vote will reveal to us who is willing to show tolerance for the intolerable,” Majority Leader Steny Hoyer of Maryland mentioned at the ground, directing his feedback to Republicans around the aisle.

Raskin and different Democrats made their case that Scavino and Navarro are amongst only a handful of people who have rebuffed the committee’s requests and subpoenas for info. The panel has interviewed greater than 800 witnesses thus far.

In the remaining week by myself, the committee scored two of the ones interviews from Trump’s daughter Ivanka Trump and her husband, Jared Kushner. Their digital testimonies are the nearest lawmakers have got to the previous president.

Members of the panel mentioned Kushner’s testimony remaining Thursday was once useful. Ivanka Trump, who was once along with her father within the White House on Jan. 6, was once puzzled for 8 hours Tuesday as congressional investigators attempted to piece in combination her father’s failed effort to lengthen the certification of the 2020 election effects.


The primary focal point of the committee’s outreach to the previous first daughter surrounds a phone name they are saying she witnessed from her father to force then-Vice President Mike Pence to reject Biden’s 2020 election win as a part of his ceremonial position overseeing the electoral depend. Pence rejected the ones efforts.

Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., the chairman of the committee, highlighted Ivanka Trump’s voluntary cooperation with the committee versus Scavino and Navarro’s defiance. Raskin mentioned Scavino has “refused to testify before Congress about what he knows about the most dangerous and sweeping assault on the United States Congress since the War of 1812.”

The committee says Scavino helped promote Trump’s false claims of a stolen election and was with him the day of the attack on the Capitol. As a result, he may have “materials relevant to his videotaping and tweeting” messages that day.


A lawyer for Scavino did not return multiple messages from The Associated Press seeking comment.

Navarro, 72, a former White House trade adviser, was subpoenaed in early February over his promotion of false claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election that the committee believes contributed to the attack.

Navarro cited executive privilege when declining to testify, saying the committee “should negotiate this matter with President Trump.” He added, “If he waived the privilege, I will be happy to comply.”

But the Biden administration has already waived executive privilege for Navarro, Scavino and former national security adviser Michael Flynn, saying it was not justified or in the national interest for them to withhold their testimony.

Executive privilege was developed to protect a president’s ability to obtain candid counsel from his advisers without fear of immediate public disclosure, but it has limits. Courts have traditionally left questions of whether to invoke executive privilege up to the current White House occupant. The Supreme Court earlier this year rejected a bid by Trump to withhold documents from the committee.


The vote Wednesday will be the third time the panel has sent contempt charges to the House floor. The first two referrals, sent late last year, were for former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and former Trump ally Steve Bannon.

The contempt referral against Bannon resulted in an indictment, with a trial set to start in July. The Justice Department has been slower to decide whether to prosecute Meadows, much to the frustration of the committee.

“It’s the committee’s hope that they will present it to a grand jury,” Thompson told reporters Tuesday. “Obviously, the Meadows case is still outstanding. We don’t really know where that is, other than we’ve done our work.”

He added, “The firewall is going up from our viewpoint, and DOJ makes use of its techniques to take it from there.”

Thompson steered extra witnesses may just nonetheless be held in contempt within the weeks forward even because the committee seems to be to wrap up the investigative portion in their paintings within the subsequent two months.


A conviction for contempt of Congress carries a tremendous of as much as $100,000 and as much as a yr in jail.


Associated Press creator Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this file.

Copyright 2022 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This subject material is probably not revealed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed with out permission.

Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.