Boris Johnson under pressure over claims No 10 partied as Queen mourned

Pressure is mounting on Boris Johnson amid new claims of Downing Street parties (Pictures: Getty)

Boris Johnson is facing renewed calls to resign over claims Downing Street held two further lockdown-breaking parties the night before the Queen was forced to sit alone at the Duke of Edinburgh’s funeral.

Advisers and civil servants gathered after work for two separate events on April 16 last year to mark the departures of James Slack, Mr Johnson’s former director of communications, and one of the PM’s personal photographers, The Telegraph reports.

They are said to have danced and drank alcohol into the early hours, with one staffer allegedly sent to a nearby Co-Op with a suitcase to fetch more wine, before the events later merged. Mr Johnson was said to have been away at Chequers at the time.

The following day the Queen attended the funeral of Prince Philip, her husband of 74 years, with a poignant photo capturing her sitting away from the rest of her family at Windsor Castle while wearing a face mask in line with Covid restrictions.

Two parties were reportedly held the night before the Queen sat alone at Prince Philip’s funeral (Picture: PA)

Sir Ed Davey, the leader of the Liberal Democrats, repeated his call for the Prime Minister to resign in the wake of the latest allegations in the ‘partygate’ crisis engulfing Number 10.

He said: ‘The Queen sitting alone, mourning the loss of her husband, was the defining image of lockdown. Not because she is the Queen, but because she was just another person, mourning alone like too many others.

‘Whilst she mourned, Number 10 partied. Johnson must go.’

His comments were echoed by Labour deputy leader Angela Rayner, who wrote on Twitter: ‘The Queen sat alone in mourning like so many did at the time with personal trauma & sacrifice to keep to the rules in the national interest.

‘I have no words for the culture & behaviours at number 10 and the buck stops with the PM.’

Relatives of coronavirus victims said they were ‘sickened’ by the latest reports and called the Tory MPs backing Mr Johnson a ‘disgrace’.

Fran Hall, from Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice, said: ‘If your neighbours had behaved like this, you’d have been disgusted. For the people running the country to do it and then lie about it, shows a complete disdain for the general public.

‘We shared the same pain of grieving in isolation as the Queen did. And she must be just as sickened as we are at hearing this. Sadly, instead of doing the decent thing and resigning, we can expect the Prime Minister to continue shamefully lying to our faces.

‘The Conservative MPs that are keeping him in power disgrace their country.’

Reports suggest as many as 30 Tory MPs have submitted letters of no confidence in the PM (Picture: PA)

The news came as Andrew Bridgen, the Conservative MP for North West Leicestershire, was the latest to publicly announce he had submitted a letter of no confidence in the Prime Minister on Thursday night.

He was the fifth MP to say he had written to Sir Graham Brady, the chair of the 1922 Committee, calling for a vote on the PM’s future as head of the party.

Mr Bridgen told BBC Newsnight: ‘With a heavy heart, I have written a letter to Sir Graham Brady indicating that I have no confidence in the Prime Minister and calling for a leadership election.’

The Telegraph reported that as many as 30 letters have been submitted so far. A total of 54 are needed to trigger a vote.

A blow was also landed on the PM from the Sutton Coldfield Conservatives, an association in a safe Tory seat, which reportedly passed a motion calling for Mr Johnson to stand down.

Downing Street has been engulfed by the ‘partygate’ crisis (Picture: Getty)

In a rare ray of hope for the Prime Minister, it was reported that an inquiry into alleged lockdown-busting events by senior official Sue Gray was expected to find no evidence of criminality.

However The Times reported that the investigation could censure Mr Johnson for a lack of judgment.

The newspaper said Ms Gray was expected to avoid concluding whether the PM breached the ministerial code, as this would fall outside her remit. But she is set criticise the culture in Downing Street, it said.

Ms Gray is examining a series of parties and gatherings held in No 10 and Whitehall in 2020 while coronavirus restrictions were in force.

At the time, Government guidance stated: ‘You must not socialise indoors except with your household or support bubble. You can meet outdoors, including in gardens, in groups of six people or two households.’

A Downing Street spokesperson said of Mr Slack’s event: ‘On this individual’s last day he gave a farewell speech to thank each team for the work they had done to support him, both those who had to be in the office for work and on a screen for those working from home.’

Mr Slack, who last year left No 10 to become deputy editor-in-chief at The Sun, said the party on April 16, 2021, ‘should not have happened at the time that it did’.

Mr Slack said in an emailed statement issued by The Sun’s publisher, News UK: ‘I wish to apologise unreservedly for the anger and hurt caused. This event should not have happened at the time that it did. I am deeply sorry, and take full responsibility.’

But he said he could not comment further as the issue has been referred to senior official Sue Gray as part of her investigation.

On Wednesday, the Prime Minister apologised for attending a ‘bring your own booze’ party in the Downing Street garden in May 2020, during the first coronavirus lockdown, but insisted he believed it was a work event and could ‘technically’ have been within the rules.

Members of the Government urged his critics to wait for the findings of Ms Gray’s inquiry before passing judgment after Tory MPs began publicly calling for him to quit.

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web
browser that
supports HTML5

Cabinet ministers defended Mr Johnson after his apology on Wednesday, but the late interventions of Foreign Secretary Liz Truss and Chancellor Rishi Sunak – both tipped as potential successors – did little to instil confidence in his future.

While Mr Johnson endured a difficult session of Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday, Mr Sunak had notably spent the day away from London on a visit in Devon.

The Prime Minister’s official spokesman insisted the Cabinet fully supported Mr Johnson.

Asked about the delay in Ms Truss and Mr Sunak showing their support, the spokesman said: ‘What the Prime Minister wants and expects is the Cabinet to be focused on delivering on the public’s priorities.’

Asked if he believed he had the full support of his Cabinet, the spokesman said: ‘Yes.’

Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries later suggested the Chancellor may have been delayed coming to the Prime Minister’s defence because of poor connectivity during his trip.

She told Channel 4 News: ‘We know he doesn’t have great signal down there.’

Cabinet members came out in defence of Mr Johnson after his apology (Picture: PA)

But Mr Johnson faced open revolt from one wing of his party, as Scottish Conservative leader Douglas Ross urged him to quit, with almost all Tory MSPs supporting the call.

In Westminster, four other Tory MPs have now publicly said Mr Johnson should go – Mr Bridgen, Sir Roger Gale, former minister Caroline Nokes and chairman of the Public Affairs and Constitutional Affairs Committee William Wragg.

The Metropolitan Police indicated any investigation by them would depend on evidence unearthed in the Gray inquiry.

The prospect of a police investigation had led to the possibility that the inquiry could be paused, but a Scotland Yard statement said: ‘The Met has ongoing contact with the Cabinet Office in relation to this inquiry.

‘If the inquiry identifies evidence of behaviour that is potentially a criminal offence it will be passed to the Met for further consideration.’

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

For more stories like this, check our news page.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *